Why is Paris St. Germain a tycoon? Why is Paris St. Germain called

Hello everyone, here today to answer your questions about Paris

St. Germain why is the landlord of some of the problems of this issue, including Paris St. Germain why is called also the same many people still do not know, therefore, today to analyze the analysis, now let's take a look at it! If you solve your problem, I hope you pay attention to this site Oh, thank you ~!

Table of Contents for this article

Why is Paris Saint-Germain called a landlord team?

Manchester City football club

and Paris

Which is richer?

I. Why Paris Saint-Germain is called a landlord team

Because the owner of Paris Saint-Germain is Tamim Al-Thani (Crown Prince of Qatar) from the rich Middle Eastern country, and at the end of May 2011 the Qatari Sovereign Wealth Fund (Qatar Investment Authority) spent 50 million euros to acquire 70% of the shares of Paris Saint-Germain. Since then, Paris Saint-Germain has become a Middle Eastern team.

Paris Saint-Germain's new owner, Tamim Al Thani, born in 1980, is not only the Crown Prince of Qatar, but also the president of the Qatar National Olympic Committee and a member of the International Olympic Committee, making him the number one figure in Qatari sports.

Tamim Al Thani under the helm of the Qatar Sports Investment Fund is a sovereign investment fund belonging to the state of Qatar, this foundation's assets are conservatively estimated at more than 60 billion dollars. After becoming the first major shareholder of Paris Saint-Germain, the Qataris began to recruit, a summer cumulative investment of 89.5 million euros to force the investment of 75 million euros, for the first time in three years did not spend more than 100 million of Manchester City.

Second, which is richer, Manchester City or Grand Paris

Which is richer, the Manchester City owner or the Paris owner?

choice (product)

best answer

In a single round of assets, the Grand Paris owner is a bit richer.

1. Manchester City Boss: Mansour

Mansour is not just a businessman, he is also a politician and a member of the UAE Cabinet Council (according to Forbes 09, Mansour's personal fortune alone amounts to 17 billion pounds).

2. Paris Boss: Nasser

Chairman of the Qatar Sports Investment Foundation, first in line of succession to the Qatari royal family (personal assets conservatively estimated by U.S. authorities at more than $60 billion)

Mansour (full name: Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan)

1. Introduction:

Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of Presidential Affairs of the UAE, one of the sons of the former President of the UAE, and brother of President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

One of the richest and most powerful figures in the world, the oil tycoon bought Manchester City in 2009 and by 2011 had invested £1 billion in the club. According to Forbes 09, Mansour's personal fortune alone amounted to £17 billion. Mansour, 39, was ranked third in the world in Forbes' 2009 list of the richest people under 40, while Sheikh Mansour's family fortune boasts $1 trillion (£555 billion), leaving him free to acquire assets abroad. The Al Hayyan family has thus become synonymous with Abu Dhabi's wealth.

2. Buy Manchester City:

In August 2009, Mansour purchased Manchester City FC for £200 million and paid off all of City's previous debts. Sheikh Mansour's wealth is primarily derived from oil and gas exports, and has grown exponentially in recent years due to the rise in global oil prices. In contrast to his illustrious life and large fortune, Sheikh Mansour's private life is very low-key. Outsiders only know that he has two wives and loves horse riding.

3. Wealth:

According to data published by Forbes in 2009, Mansour's personal fortune amounted to 17 billion pounds and the then 39-year-old was ranked third in the world in Forbes' 2009 list of the richest people under 40.

Sheikh Mansour's wealth comes mainly from oil and gas exports.

In the transfer market, both Manchester City and Paris have often shocked the world soccer world with various luxury purchases. The two teams are undoubtedly the most expensive teams in European soccer today, both backed by a strong West Asian consortium, so which team is better in terms of financial strength?

Qatar Consortium's Grand Paris

British media "Daily Mail" once wrote an article comparing the Manchester City and Paris "wealth value", which, behind the parent company of Paris for the Qatar Investment Group, the backstage boss is the Qatar Investment Group and Bein Media Group double chairman Nasser. U.S. authorities conservatively estimated Nasser's personal assets of more than 60 billion U.S. dollars. Qatar Investment Group assets totaling 120 billion pounds (Forbes data), the main business involves oil, gas, automotive field (holding Porsche and Volkswagen shares) and so on.

UAE consortium's Manchester City

Behind City, on the other hand, is the Abu Dhabi Consortium, and the backroom owner is UAE mega-rich Sheikh Mansour, Minister of Presidential Affairs of the UAE, one of the sons of the former President of the UAE, and the younger brother of the President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan. Mansour is a member of the UAE Cabinet Council and has personal assets of around £17 billion. Abu Dhabi United Group has assets of up to 555 billion pounds (Forbes data), the main business involves real estate, finance and so on. And with Manchester City Council, it has formed a 10-year partnership.

The financial power behind these two teams is far beyond that of ordinary companies and consortiums, which explains why the two tycoon teams are able to call the shots in the transfer market. Whether it's building Neymar and Mbappe

The "two hundred million" Paris, or the average annual transfer investment of more than 200 million Manchester City, the transfer costs for the parent company behind the two teams, is undoubtedly a hair of rain.

Although the wealth of the parent company behind the team can not be fully invested in the team, but if the two teams really want to fight hard power, there is no doubt that Manchester City is still better. Although the owner of Paris Nasser's personal wealth is more than that of Manchester City's owner Mansour; but the UAE consortium behind Manchester City, the background strength is still higher than that of the Qatar consortium of Paris.

Both clubs are very rich and often spend big in the transfer market to attract new players. In the summer of last year, Paris attracted worldwide attention when they brought in Barcelona star Neymar for a world record price. Who actually owns these clubs and why they are so rich has become a matter of concern for many fans. If there is any question about who owns these two clubs and who is rich, I'm afraid that through the available information, the gold owner of Grand Paris is much richer.

The executive chairman of Paris Saint-Germain is Nasser Al-Khelaifi, but the actual owner of Paris is the Qatar Sports Investment Fund, which is part of the Qatar Investment Authority, which is part of the country's Sovereign Wealth Fund, a fund that has investments everywhere in the world, and which is managed by the Emir of Qatar (the Emir is the name given to the head of state of Qatar).

The Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) is a sovereign wealth fund organized at the Government's expense, specializing in domestic and foreign investments. QIA has full control over the Qatari Diar Real Estate Investment Company (QDREIC), which is a property and ownership investment fund. QIA probably has assets in excess of $60 billion.

Premier League club Manchester City is owned by Sheikh Mansour, who is the Minister of Presidential Affairs of the UAE, one of the sons of the former UAE President, and brother of President Sheikh Khalifa. He bought Manchester City in 2009, and according to Forbes 09, Mansour's personal fortune alone amounted to £17 billion, while Sheikh Mansour's family fortune boasts $1 trillion (£555 billion). (W)

Paris Saint-Germain's executive chairman is Al-Khelaifi, but Paris is actually owned by the Qatar Sports Investment Fund, which is part of the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA), the country's sovereign wealth fund that has investments around the world, and which has full control of Qatar Diar Real Estate Investment Company, an investment fund of a property and ownership nature. QIA fully controls QDREIC, a property and ownership investment fund. QIA probably has more than $60 billion in assets. Paris owner Tamim Al-Thani is now the king of Qatar.

It is understood that the whole of Qatar is his property. Specializes in domestic and foreign investments.

Although the wealth of the Abu Dhabi consortium far exceeds that of the Qatar consortium, Mansour is only a prince and a director in the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, and is not at the mercy of the state-owned assets as Al Thani is. The size of the Abu Dhabi royal family's assets is now $109.7 billion, which translates to £850 billion. Manchester City's parent company is masterminded by Abu Dhabi, managed by Mansour, with Al. Mubarak as chairman of the board. At the same time Manchester City's parent company City Football Group, also has two shareholders, respectively, Chinese Culture Group and CITIC Capital, these two companies hold 13% of the shares of the City Football Group, CITIC Capital needless to say, Chinese Culture Group Chairman of the Board of Directors, Lai Ruigang, is the former Secretary General of the Office of the Shanghai Zhengsui, the Chinese culture of the major shareholders of the State Development Finance, is a subsidiary of the China Development Bank.

The financial strength behind these two ball clubs is far from ordinary companies and consortia can be compared, the two ball clubs behind the consortium neither will not be able to put all the money into the soccer industry, at the same time, the soccer industry also has no way to accommodate such a large amount of capital, in short, whether it is to buy Neymar's Paris, or an average of more than 200 million spent on the year, the big Manchester City, these people look at the watch all feel staggering transfer costs, in their opinion But it's just a hair's breadth.

If there is any question as to who owns these two clubs and who has the money, I'm afraid, through the available information, that the gold masters of Grand Paris are much richer.

Money does play a crucial role in soccer at this stage, especially in the current environment where the transfer market is becoming increasingly inflated. Especially Neymar transfer event is the big Paris pushed on the wind between the waves, and another big tycoon on behalf of the current transfer market spent more than 200 million pounds is the two who is more tycoon become the focus of debate on the network. The answer is in fact no doubt, Manchester City's financial strength is far greater than Paris, Paris has only one club, the city soccer group and in addition to Manchester City's own team, Manchester City in North and South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and even Oceania have their own satellite clubs. From Ning outside the two soccer clubs behind the parent company's financial strength comparison of the two is definitely not a level.

Values of the wealth of Saint-Germain de France.

Behind the parent company: Qatar Investment Authority, with total assets of 120 billion pounds (Forbes data), the main business involves oil, gas, automotive field (holdings in Porsche and Volkswagen) and so on.

City's various wealth values:

Behind the parent company: Abu Dhabi United Group assets up to 555 billion pounds (Forbes data), the main business involves real estate, finance and so on. And with Manchester City Council, formed a 10-year partnership.

Let's take a joint look at the plutocratic backgrounds behind the two clubs so we can determine who has more money!

The plutocracy behind Manchester City: the UAE's Abu Dhabi consortium

1. September 2008 acquisition of Manchester City;

2, the owner: Mansour, Minister of Presidential Affairs of the UAE, brother of President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayyah, son of the former president, personal assets in the 19 billion pounds;

3, background: Abu Dhabi United Group assets of up to 550 billion pounds, the main business involves real estate, finance and so on.

4. The Manchester City team is valued at £1 billion, and Mansour's cumulative investment of £1.2 billion is a drop in the ocean of Mansour's personal and consortium assets!

The plutocrat behind Paris Saint-Germain: Qatar Investment Authority

1. On May 31, 2011, the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) acquired a 70% stake in Grand Paris and became the largest shareholder;

2. Owner: Nasser Al-Khelaifi, said to be a member of the Qatari royal family, while others say he's just a fisherman's kid, just a white glove for the Qatar Investment Authority.

3. Background: Qatar Investment Authority (QIA), with total assets of 120 billion pounds sterling (GBP), and main businesses in the oil, gas, and automotive sectors (holding shares in Porsche and Volkswagen) .......

4. Valuation of Paris Saint-Germain: £450 million, with the Qatar Investment Authority accumulating £750 million!

Based on the financial strength of the consortium behind them alone, the UAE's Abu Dhabi consortium is richer than the Qatari consortium and has a considerable advantage in terms of City's inputs as well as the owner's personal assets, so I'm judging that the owner behind City is richer!

First of all, two examples of Chelsea Abu just took over when it is a medium grade team, anyway, the giants are far away, but the Russian tycoon smashed the money, champions champions a hard to the hand, and the reinforcements are quite a standard and in the world have the influence of the ball players, so in just more than a decade to pull together a large number of fans, the results are also very good.

Then there's Russia's Anzhi, which was also taken over by a tycoon who bought good players, and Eto'o, who was also the world's highest-paid player at the time, but still couldn't dominate the Russian Premier League and was relegated with its financial problems as its results went down the tubes and even relegated.

Through these two examples and then look at Paris City is not at all bad at the moment, in terms of the league Paris previously a one-two punch now Monaco

Jump out can give some threat, Manchester City due to the Premier League competition is too fierce, but every year to ensure that the Champions League seat belongs to the first group is also very powerful, but in the Champions League results have not been very ideal, although every year spend money to attract reinforcements but the team is the lack of the kind of dominant level of aura of the players, there is no just the overall feeling of the car is like a patchwork of the East and the West, driving up is not very smooth, the grinding The lack of sufficient, either the level of the coach is limited, or the idea of attracting reinforcements did not reach the ideal degree of the coach. Bench thickness configuration is also the key, after all, these two teams can only be said to be the tycoon team, can not be considered a luxury team, this heritage is not enough, and for the real world-class stars, it is difficult to have that kind of dream from childhood want to play for, look at the signing of the stars, I dare say that 95% of them are because of the high salary that can not be refused.

Finally or that Paris City than which rich is not necessary, are not bad money. In the funds to ensure that no salary arrears do not go bankrupt on the line, do not like the first few years of Arsenal, the main thing is to look at the club's management team, which is the key to determine whether a team's success.

City spent a lot of money on players last year and what happened, only managed to salvage a Champions League qualification, this year they've spent a lot more and looked good in the warm up, let's hope it pays off.

Paris has always played the role of the tycoon, but because of the low level of the league in which it is located, as well as its poor results in the Champions League, the stars attracted to the team are often those who can not stay in the team, and the listing price is so high that the other clubs are not willing to acquire them. Most of the high-level players who go to Grand Paris are South American, after all, they are more susceptible to the lure of money.

So two clubs with money but poor results (in the league as well as the Champions League) will only be perceived as dirt-cheap teams, not giants.

The question is not really interesting to answer anymore, does it make sense to be richer than rich for 2 consortiums that both have national backgrounds one is Qatar and the other is still UAE.

For their money to be used in soccer is already more than enough. The only thing that can restrain the 2 consortiums at the moment is UEFA's financial fairness policy, without which there would be no stars in the world that they couldn't buy.

The current owners of Grand Paris have handed out almost a billion plus for the team, most notably for Neymar last summer. In order to get Neymar, Big Paris went out of their way to offend Barcelona

, a direct breach of contract takedown, and even more so, a sky-high contract for Neymar, as well as absolute authority within the team.

Neymar just joined the big Paris during the period, because of the ownership of the penalty kicks, and Cavani messed up. Caused a lot of internal conflicts within the team, after being Real Madrid

After the elimination except for the Champions League, there must be another big purge this summer of those players who don't get along with Neymar.

As for Man City, controlled by Mansour, the investment before and after is basically over 2 billion. In order to be able to get the Champions League title, they are not afraid to pay their players high salaries and bring in world-class managers.

After the failures of Hughes, Mancini and Pellegrini, the club brought in the world's best paid manager, Pep Guardiola, in the summer of '16. Gave the world's highest salary, as well as giving sufficient transfer fees, in the melon manager 2 years, probably sent more than 500 million pounds of transfer fees, the basic players changed again.

After experiencing the first season of the four big failure, this season Manchester City in the hanging under the guidance of the coach, has already had the shadow of the original melon Shuai led Barcelona, no matter from the transmission and control, or the way of playing basically has been molded. This season, Manchester City in the Premier League is basically in a state of invincibility, currently leading the second place Manchester United 18 points, in the case of the league still has 9 rounds left, basically locked up this season's Premier League Championship and the League Cup Champion. With 9 rounds left in the league, the Premier League title and the League Cup title are basically locked in this season. Entering the last 8 of the Champions League successfully is already considered a success for Man City this season.

So, compared to money, the 2 clubs are both rich, but both receive controls from UEFA's fiscal policy, but in terms of the team's results so far, there's no doubt that Manchester City is the success.

Read and follow and get rich for life, thanks!

Well, the article ends here, if this share of Paris Saint-Germain why is the tycoon and Paris Saint-Germain why is called the problem to help you, but also want to pay attention to this site Oh!