The Independent notes that now
England Premier Soccer League
There are still about 9 rounds of matches yet to be played, a total of 92 matches, and England's current state of closure is likely to continue into the summer, so it seems unfeasible to continue to move home and away, the league discussed a special way to cope with the situation, is to segregate the players of each team in a large camp similar to the World Cup, to centralize the management of health conditions, and accelerate the rest of the fixtures to be kicked off in this segregated situation, of course, empty, of course. Just make the games available for broadcast.
and the more likely choices would be the Midlands of England or London (which should mean the London suburbs).
It seems that with countries closing their doors these days, everyone is left to fend for themselves, with each country having a different epidemic situation.
England Premier Soccer League
considered to be the fastest to come up with a program, and other countries such as Italy and Spain, where the epidemic is so severe and a significant number of players are infected, may have difficulty even implementing this program.
The English FA seems to mean that even if the season is postponed, they want to finish it, the main problem still lies in the major interest of the broadcasting rights, if the TV station can't broadcast all the scheduled matches in the end, then the teams have to return the broadcasting rights of 760 million pounds, which will be a fatal blow to many teams that have already had financial problems or even have the risk of bankruptcy, and even a lot of the sponsorship contracts will form the default of the contract to a certain extent. It would be a breach of contract
England Premier Soccer League
The possible handling of this contingency at the moment is more like just don't create a breach of contract situation, and they intend to bite the bullet for a bit, plus FIFA had some guidelines announced last week, one of which is not to set a deadline for the end of the season for the national leagues, as well as not to schedule fixtures that are harmful to the health of the players, and that the interval between matches has to be 72 hours, and that the 2020 Summer
transfer to another club (professional sports)
The window will be extended to 4 months, possibly merged directly with the winter window, etc.
After it was determined that there was no deadline for the season to end, this summer camp approach became a possible option that could wait until after June or even closer to July to kick off, and in a 3-day format it was possible to finish the rest of the schedule within a month
It seems likely that this will be the final solution, as it's hard to think of any other solution, and the previously discussed play-offs and special elevation system will be unfair no matter how it's arranged. Playing the original number of matches, and losing some of the original weekly breaks and the home advantage, while maintaining the same points and competition as before the season was suspended, seems fairer to all teams. It seems fairer to all teams
Of course it will produce pluses for certain teams, such as the heavily injured
Tottenham Hotspur (city in Morocco)
The variables in the race for fourth place will again become very delicate as all the key players should be back by then.
So if there are no surprises, we'll likely see a sort of World Cup schedule-style league in June and July, which means that there will be games almost every day then, with 3+ consecutive games to watch each day
However, there are still controversies and ethical risks associated with this format, for example, the referees, broadcasters and staff will have to be stationed in the quarantine camp together, i.e., quarantined together, and will these people agree or refuse to be stationed in the quarantine camp?
The other ethical issue is that medical resources are still very tight at the moment, and it is expected that even in the summer, the medical staff will still be very busy, and at that time, for the sake of these big-name players, the isolation camps will also need a large number of quarantine staff and possibly medical staff, and if the players are injured during the game will still be sent to the hospital for treatment, is it necessary for the sake of the sports and entertainment business to use these medical and quarantine resources, which will probably still be very tight at that time? Is it necessary to use these medical and quarantine resources, which may still be in short supply at that time, for the sake of sports entertainment?
I think the intensity of the matches will be a big question mark too, if the epidemic in Europe is over by then, then it will indeed be a small World Cup style month of hot matches (just without the live crowds), and could replace the postponed European Cup of Nations at the same time, and there will still be great matches in June or July, and even more so if the other countries follow suit, and potentially turn into a big match at every time of day for you. If the epidemic subsides, you'll be watching the games until you pass out!
But if the epidemic is still raging, then I believe the players won't want to play soccer at all, and there may even be some people who don't want to play, and some staff members may refuse to participate, and the problem of wasting medical resources will naturally become very serious. Overall, this program does solve the fairness and economic problems for the rest of the season, but it all depends on the luck of the draw, and it is up to God to decide whether the virus will really decrease in activity and concentration in the summer and whether mankind will develop a vaccine or an effective treatment. Whether or not the virus activity and concentration will drop during the summer, and whether or not mankind will be able to develop a vaccine or an effective treatment, is all up to fate. If things don't go well, even if the camp does start, everyone will probably just kick back, play a little bit, and then go home to take care of their health.
